Face-to-face interaction between students and their teacher is at the heart of conventional education. A full class of students is the right platform for vigorous attention to discuss and understand a topic.
However, when not in class, students lose many opportunities to hear and receive meaning. Rarely would they admit that such loss pulls down their marks – till they become parents, a generation later.
The students’ usual plea is that their classes are not ‘interesting’. But the teacher’s role is to explain and create awareness - not to entertain. By missing classes, a student fails to gain knowledge, becomes less able, and therefore, less valuable to a prospective employer.
One University in New Delhi had debarred many students from their examinations for not having minimum attendance in their classes. It had also shut down a graduate course for the same reason. Recently, its Vice-Chancellor berated their teachers for not guiding students to change their lives. These were bold actions and statements, but would they drive away the larger problem of absenteeism?
Private institutions may waive poor attendance citing the student’s ill-health or participation in off-campus extra-curricular activities. Is this a compromise, a surrender, or merely, pragmatism?
What is the value of a degree when the student has been needlessly absent? No employer would want to hire even a top-grade student if they suspected him to be irregular at work.
Superior academic performance is so critical to career entry. Therefore, let us begin by waiving minimum attendance and the term-end memory-based examinations. It would be more prudent to assess students' learning from off-campus assignments linked to their class presence, and from their in-class exercises, discussions and debates.
Meanwhile, content and teaching process in class would keep pace with the students' understanding. This would compel teachers to learn along with their students!
And soon, we would have eliminated this animal called absenteeism from our schools and colleges.